|
What Is This Indicator, and Why Is It Important?
This indicator reports the number of times Americans over
the age of 15 took part in a variety of outdoor recreational
activities. (Each time someone took part in an activity is
counted: if the activity took place over multiple days, each
day counts as a separate event, and if a person took part
in several activities on a single day, each activity is counted
as a separate event.)
Outdoor recreation is highly popular, with many people taking
part in at least one of the listed activities over the course
of the year. Recreation is a benefit that is derived from
ecosystems, in much the same way as we derive products such
as food, fiber, and water
from these systems.
What Do the Data Show? Walking is by far
the most common outdoor recreation activity for which information
is available. Americans over the age of 15 walk outdoors
about 18
billion times per year. Nature viewing is the next in
terms of
popularity, with
Americans taking
part in viewing
activities nearly
12 billion times per year.
The lower graphs break out annual participation in all
other land-based activities, and all water
activities, showing participation in outdoor
social activities like picnics and family gatherings, and
in hiking, boating, swimming, and fishing.
Why Can't This Entire Indicator Be Reported at This
Time? The data presented here are from an extensive
national survey. However, the list of recreational activities
about which data are collected is not exhaustive, and the
survey currently does not distinguish between fresh and salt
water for many aquatic activities.
Discussion This indicator reports the number
of times people participated in various activities, not how long
they spent, so an hourlong walk and a day at the beach count the
same (as noted above, each day in a multiday trip is counted as
a separate event). Therefore, the fact that people participated
more frequently in some activities (such as walking) does not
necessarily mean that they spent more time on this than another
activity. Finally, the Forest Service was unable to
explain the apparent and very large
increase in “hiking” from 1995 to 2001.
|