The Indicator
The indicator would report on the ecological integrity or health of riparian
ecosystems, including both physical and biological factors.
The number and quality of streams and rivers and their associated riparian
areas are a function of watershed conditions. Consequently, the condition of
riparian areas may be useful as an indicator of ecological alterations of grassland
and shrubland watersheds. For example, if land cover is altered, the stream
flow may also be altered, changing the geomorphology of the river channel and
influencing riparian dynamics. Regulation of rivers by dams and other flow-altering
devices also influences downstream conditions, including streambank erosion
and river meandering, sediment aggradation and seedbed development, and natural
recruitment of riparian vegetation. Local land use within a floodplain, such
as agriculture, grazing, and urbanization, may also greatly influence the condition
of riparian ecosystems. In turn, riparian systems also influence hydrogeomorphic
processes by trapping sediment and modifying flood flows and groundwater recharge.
The Data Gap
Several measures are being used nationally, but no simple index
has received general acceptance among the research community. An appropriate
Index of Riparian Integrity still needs to be fully developed. Several
federal agencies use a combined qualitative metric called Proper Functioning
Condition (PFC) when evaluating riparian systems (see Bureau of Land Management
1993). However, PFC is primarily hydrogeomorphic and includes little of the
biological conditions such as species composition, age classes, understory condition,
canopy condition, and successional processes. Another methodology developed
in the past few years is the Hydrogeomorphic Methodology (HGM) (Brinson 1996,
Smith et al. 1995). This methodology uses a complex of indices for hydrology,
geomorphology, land use, biology, and other aspects to create a single index
for the riparian system. It is complex, but a simplified version might be developed
for broad-scale application. Yet another, simpler method is one that relies
on satellite data (Iverson et al. 2001).
Aspects of the riparian condition that can be measured on a regional basis
and that should be considered in any multi-metric index include hydrology (e.g.,
relationship to natural flow patterns), geomorphology (e.g., stream sediment
transport), and biology (e.g., canopy cover condition; percentage of potential
recruitment or successional measures; canopy diversity, or coverage of point
bars). Many of these aspects either are being measured now or could be measured
as part of a national riparian evaluation system.
Once an index is developed, it would be applied within a sampling design that
would allow estimation of the conditions on all streams within a region. Thus,
for example, such an approach might provide estimates of the number of miles
of stream with riparian condition index that is high,
medium, or low, each of these being within a selected
numerical range of the index.
References
Brinson, M.M. 1996. Assessing wetland functions using HGM. National Wetlands
Newsletter 18:1016.
Bureau of Land Management.1993. Riparian area management: Process for assessing
proper functioning condition. Technical Reference 1737-9. USDOI, BLM, Denver,
CO. Revised 1995, 1998.
Iverson, L.R., D.L Szafoni, S.E. Baum, and E.A. Cook. 2001. Development of
a riparian wildlife habitat evaluation scheme using GIS. Environmental Management
28(5):639654.
Smith, R.D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M.M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for
assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference
wetlands and functional indices. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment
Station. Vicksburg, MS. Tech. Rep. TR-WRP-DE-9
|