|
What Is This Indicator, and Why Is It Important?
This indicator would report the percentage of croplands in
three different ranges on the Nematode Maturity Index (NMI),
an index that measures the types of roundworms, or nematodes,
in the soil. A map showing the percentage of cropland in each
major cropland region with low index values (indicating disturbed
soils) would accompany the nationwide data.
Healthy soils contain many different microscopic animals.
Agricultural practices often disturb the soil, and the amount
of disturbance can be measured by changes in these microscopic
animals. This indicator is based on the identification of
various types of nematodes, each of which has a different
tolerance for soil disturbance. Calculation of the NMI is
based on the proportion of nematodes with different levels
of tolerance for disturbance. Low NMI values (less than 2.5)
are often found in soils subjected to intensive agricultural
production methods, like monoculture and the use of high levels
of nitrogen fertilizer and pesticides. Midrange values (from
2.5 to 3.5) suggest a more diverse soil community and often
reflect such practices as crop mixtures and rotations and
no-till farming. High NMI values (greater than 3.5) are rarely
found on cultivated lands.
Soil biological condition, along with organic
matter content, erosion,
and soil salinity are key indicators
of soil quality, reflecting the effect of agriculture on soils
and the influence of changing crop and soil management practices.
Why Can't This Entire Indicator Be Reported at This
Time? Measuring soil quality by measuring soil organisms
has gained broad scientific acceptance. While the Nematode
Maturity Index is a promising indicator, it has not yet been
adopted by a nationwide monitoring program. However, NMI has
been applied successfully in two statewide surveys (North
Carolina and Nebraska) carried out in cooperation with the
National Agricultural Statistics Service.
Reporting of soil quality based on nematode populations would
require large-scale implementation of the indicator described
here. This could be done through an existing national monitoring
program, or state-based monitoring using consistent methods
would allow the resulting information to be aggregated at
the national level.
|