|
What Is This Indicator, and Why Is It Important?
This indicator reports the percentage of sediments that exceed
federal guidelines for concentrations of four major classes
of contaminantspesticides, polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
and heavy metals. The indicator reports on estuaries
and ocean waters within 25 miles of the coast that have
bottom sediments with varying degrees of contamination,
the lowest indicating "possible adverse effects" on fish
and other aquatic organisms from 1 to 4 contaminants and
the highest indicating "probable adverse effects" from
at least one contaminant.
Polluted sediments are a starting point for contamination
throughout the food chain, potentially damaging marine life
and affecting human health (see Selected
Contaminants in Fish and Shellfish). Pollutants from industrial
discharges, burning of fossil fuels, and runoff from farms
and urban and suburban areas are carried to coastal waters
by rivers, rainfall, and wind, where they accumulate on the
bottom. Small organisms incorporate these contaminants into
their bodies, and when they are eaten by other organisms,
the contaminants may move up the food chain (bioaccumulation).
Areas with contaminated sediments may also be unsafe for swimming
and other recreation.
Why Can't This Entire Indicator Be Reported at This
Time? No program exists to provide nationally
consistent data on sediment contamination in ocean waters
along the coast. Data for estuaries in in Alaska and
Hawaii are not available.
What Do the Data Show? During 1999-2000,
42% of estuary sediments tested had contaminants above levels
designed to predict "possible adverse effects" on aquatic life for one or more
contaminants, and about 7% exceeded the level designed to predict "probable
adverse effects." Data for the period from 1990-1997 are not comparable because
they did not include the North Atlantic and Pacific Coast estuaries. In addition,
the pesticide Dieldrin is no longer included in the suite of contaminants used
to predict "possible adverse effects" or "probable adverse effects" (see technical
note). For these reason, it is not possible directly to compare the data from
the earlier time period to the 1999-2000 time period. (Note that all sites
with contaminants exceeding the "probable adverse effects" guidelines also
had 5 or more compounds exceeding the "possible adverse effects"
level.)
Discussion The NOAA guidelines used here
were developed as informal interpretive tools and are not
intended as the basis for regulatory decisions. The "possible
adverse effects" guidelines identify concentrations below
which negative effects rarely occur, and thus levels above
which such effects may occur. The "probable adverse effects"
guidelines indicate levels above which negative effects are
likely.
|